[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Original]
Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter
[Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:38:55 +0200
Andreu Escudero <lemon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, not really, but the fact that 2:3 pulldown must be done to view
> a 24FPS film on a 60fPS/30FPS screen is much more annoying than the 4%
> speed increase.
I have to disagree there. I find that 4% difference to be a problem.
Speeding-up changes the pitch of the sound as well as the action of the
video. It's annoying with speech, and intolerable with music.
> Anyway, the best option for film viewing is actually a PAL DVD slowed
> down to 24FPS, then you have the higher resolution from PAL with the
The higher resolution from PAL is a non-issue with (widescreen) DVDs.
With NTSC, you could use as much as 480 lines, and just use the aspect
to stretch it to widescreen. I don't suppose you've ever seen a
widescreen DVD that uses more than 480 lines?
> cinema timing, and with a real progressive image, without all the
> pullup complications (hard pulldowned NTSC DVDs are a nightmare
> sometimes).
Yes, but just about all NTSC DVDs are already progressive, (in real
time, with 23.976 fps). The only time you really see non-progressive
DVDs, is for TV shows, which use NTSC cameras. So not much advantage
to using PAL there.
> I hope anyway that when the HDTV really arrives, a standard would be
> chosen able to function both in NTSC and PAL land.
I agree completely. The update to HDTV will be such an improvement, in
many ways. Networks are certainly taking their sweet time switching
over their broadcasts, though.
> Anyway, as I'm able (like everything in this list) to watch both NTSC
> and PAL, I think we can stop talking about the upsides/downsides of
> each system.
Good idea. Clogged up enough mail-boxes on this, haven't we?
_______________________________________________
RTFM!!! http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/DOCS
Search: http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/cgi-bin/htsearch
http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users
- Re: [MPlayer-users] which deinterlace filter, (continued)
- Re: [MPlayer-users] which deinterlace filter, Matthias Wieser, 2003/10/12
- Re: [MPlayer-users] which deinterlace filter, D Richard Felker III, 2003/10/12
- [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, Stefan Seyfried, 2003/10/16
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, rcooley, 2003/10/16
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, Andreu Escudero, 2003/10/16
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, rcooley, 2003/10/16
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, Andreu Escudero, 2003/10/16
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter,
rcooley <=
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, Jason Tackaberry, 2003/10/17
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, Andreu Escudero, 2003/10/17
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, rcooley, 2003/10/18
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, D Richard Felker III, 2003/10/18
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, rcooley, 2003/10/18
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, Jason Tackaberry, 2003/10/18
- [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, Stefan Seyfried, 2003/10/17
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, D Richard Felker III, 2003/10/18
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, Corey Hickey, 2003/10/18
- Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: which deinterlace filter, D Richard Felker III, 2003/10/18