[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Original]
Re: [transcode-users] Re: Captured source to DVD
Erik Slagter wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 14:05 -0800, Phil Ehrens wrote:
> > > >Why are you using mpeg2enc btw? Special reason?
> > >
> > > habit - I used to use mpeg2enc with older versions of transcode and still
> > > use it.... I thought ffmpeg was faster, but that mpeg2enc was better - am
> > > I
> > > mistaken ??
> >
> > I am not convinced that mpeg2enc is better. See this:
> >
> > http://www.transcoding.org/cgi-bin/transcode?FFmpeg_Vs._Mpeg2enc
> >
> > And because ffmpeg is so much faster, it is possible to apply
> > filters (like denoising) and have the encode actually finish
> > in a human lifetime.
>
> Yeah, common practise. In a certain community where everybody
> has 0% knowledge of digital multimedia, there is always one person
> that has 1% knowledge. Everything this guy says is "the truth".
> The worst part is that these stories tend to spread and live
> forever, while nobody knows where they came from.
Where can I find Mr. 1%? I sure would like to pick his brains
on some of this stuff...
--
Phil Ehrens <phil@xxxxxxxx> | Fun stuff:
The SilverLake Linux Users Group | http://www.ralphmag.org
3428 Winslow Drive | http://www.yellow5.com
Silverlake, CA 90026 | http://www.slug.org